mmr.fadf.ieu.edu.tr
Course Name | |
Code | Semester | Theory (hour/week) | Application/Lab (hour/week) | Local Credits | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fall/Spring |
Prerequisites | None | |||||
Course Language | ||||||
Course Type | Elective | |||||
Course Level | - | |||||
Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | ||||||
Course Coordinator | - | |||||
Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
Assistant(s) | - |
Course Objectives | |
Learning Outcomes | The students who succeeded in this course;
|
Course Description |
| Core Courses | |
Major Area Courses | X | |
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Managment Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
Week | Subjects | Required Materials |
1 | Introduction | |
2 | Understanding Urban Design | Assignment 1 – What is Urban Design? |
3 | Field Trip Urban Space (izmir Center) | |
4 | Looking Back | Assignment 2 – Analyzing Urban Space |
5 | Dimensions of Urban Design | |
6 | Field Trip Visual Dimension (Karsiyaka | |
7 | Visual Dimension of Urban Space | Assignment 3 – Comparing Urban Space |
8 | Holiday | |
9 | MIDTERM EXAM | |
10 | Field Trip City as object of art (Bergama | |
11 | Collaboration | Assignment 4 – Artist and Architect |
12 | Art & Architecture | |
13 | Field Trip Design products (Efes) | Assignment 5 – Art and City |
14 | Presentations | |
15 | Presentations | |
16 | Review of the Semester |
Course Notes/Textbooks | |
Suggested Readings/Materials | REVIEWS ARTISTS AND PUBLIC SPACE, edited by Ruth Charity, Black Dog Publishing Ltd, 2005.URBAN SPACES, by Arian Mostaedi, Carles Broto & Josep Minguet Publishers, 2003.ARCHITECTURE : ART, by Philip Jodidio, Prestel Publisihing Ltd, 2005.PUBLIC PLACESURBAN SPACES, by Matthew C., Tim H., Taner O., Steve T. ArchitecturalPress, 2003.TWO MINDS – ARTISTS AND ARCHITECTS IN COLLABORATION, edited by Jes Fernie, Black Dog Publishing, 2006.DESIGNING PUBLIC edited by Michael Erlhoff, Philipp Heidkamp, Iris Utikal, Birkhauser, 2008.CONTEMPORARY PUBLIC SPACE by Aldo Aymonino, Valerio Paolo Mosco, Skira Editore, 2006. |
Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
Participation | 15 | |
Laboratory / Application | ||
Field Work | ||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
Portfolio | ||
Homework / Assignments | 1 | 20 |
Presentation / Jury | 1 | 20 |
Project | 1 | 45 |
Seminar / Workshop | ||
Oral Exam | ||
Midterm | ||
Final Exam | ||
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade | 2 | 85 |
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | 1 | 15 |
Total |
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) | 16 | 3 | 48 |
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) | 16 | ||
Study Hours Out of Class | 15 | 1 | |
Field Work | |||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | |||
Portfolio | |||
Homework / Assignments | 1 | 20 | |
Presentation / Jury | 1 | 7 | |
Project | 1 | 20 | |
Seminar / Workshop | |||
Oral Exam | |||
Midterms | 1 | ||
Final Exams | |||
Total | 110 |
# | Program Competencies/Outcomes | * Contribution Level | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | Ability to apply theoretical and technical knowledge in architecture. | X | ||||
2 | Ability to understand, interpret and evaluate architectural concepts and theories. | X | ||||
3 | Ability to take on responsibility as an individual and as a team member to solve complex problems in the practice of architecture.
| X | ||||
4 | Critical evaluation of acquired knowledge and skills to diagnose individual educational needs and to direct self-education. | X | ||||
5 | Ability to communicate architectural ideas and proposals for solutions to architectural problems in visual, written and oral form. | X | ||||
6 | Ability to support architectural thoughts and proposals for solutions to architectural problems with qualitative and quantitative data and to communicate these with specialists and non-specialists. | X | ||||
7 | Ability to use a foreign language to follow developments in architecture and to communicate with colleagues. | X | ||||
8 | Ability to use digital information and communication technologies at a level that is adequate to the discipline of architecture. | X | ||||
9 | Being equipped with social, scientific and ethical values in the accumulation, interpretation and/or application of architectural data. | X | ||||
10 | Ability to collaborate with other disciplines that are directly or indirectly related to architecture with basic knowledge in these disciplines. | X |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest